law-damages-proof


Aquaplex, Inc v. Rancho Law Valencia, Inc., No. 08-0280 (Tex. Oct 30, 2009)(per curiam)  
(
fraud damages, proving amount of damages, remittiture by court of appeals or new trial)
AQUAPLEX, INC. AND JAMES EDWARD JONES, JR. v. RANCHO LA VALENCIA, INC. AND CHARLES R.
"RANDY" TURNER; from Travis County; 7th district (07-06-00157-CV, 253 SW3d 728, 11-02-07)    
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without
hearing oral argument, the Court affirms in part and reverses in part the court of appeals' judgment
and remands the case to that court.


Bennett v McDaniel, No. 08-0618 (Tex. Aug. 21, 2009)(failure to prove damages in post-answer default
hearing requires remand to the trial court, rather than reversal and rendition of take-nothing
judgment).           
BENNY BENNETT AND WIFE, MARY BENNETT v. RICHARD MCDANIEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A
RICHARD MCDANIEL, INC., D/B/A B.R. ROOFING, A/K/A B&R ROOFING; from Wheeler County; 7th
district (
07-06-00250-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-30-08)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without
hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals’ judgment and remands the case to the
trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion