law-special-exceptions | sufficiency of pleadings motion | pleading deficiency
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS CASE LAW
Kerlin v. Soto Arias, No. 06-0097 (Tex. Nov. 14, 2008)(challenge to deed, sufficiency of affidavit, lack personal
knowledge, hearsay, foreign language translation)
GILBERT KERLIN, INDIVIDUALLY, GILBERT KERLIN, TRUSTEE, WINDWARD OIL & GAS CORP., AND PI
CORP v. GLORIA SOTO ARIAS, ET AL.; from Cameron County; 13th district (13‑03‑00364‑CV, ___ SW3d ___,
01‑05‑06)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.
Per Curiam Opinion
09-0383
EMORY B. PERRY, ET AL. v. DARRYL R. COHEN, ET AL.; from Travis County;
3rd district (03-05-00786-CV, 285 SW3d 137, 03-26-09, pet. denied Sep. 2009)
(concurring opinion) (Justice Hecht not sitting)(special exceptions)
We consider this appeal on remand from the supreme court. See Perry v. Cohen, 272 S.W.3d 585, 586 (Tex.
2008) (per curiam). Appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting appellees' special exceptions and
in dismissing appellants' claims. Because we conclude the trial court did not err in granting appellees' special
exceptions or in dismissing appellants' claims with prejudice, we affirm the trial court's orders.
CONCLUSION Because we conclude there was no error in the trial court's order granting special exceptions
and no error in the trial court's order dismissing the shareholders' claims with prejudice, we affirm the trial
court's orders.