law-exclusion-of-evidence | mandatory exclusion due to failure to designate witness failure to disclose |
EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE
STATE'S CONDEMNATION DAMAGES EXPERT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STRUCK, COURT SAYS
State of Texas v. Central Expressway Sign Ass'n. No. 08-0061 (Tex. Jun. 26, 2009)(O'Neill)(admissibility of expert
testimony, methods of appraising value of condemned property, here billboard easement)(exclusion of expert
witness testimony was erroneous and harmful, judgment reversed)
THE STATE OF TEXAS v. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SIGN ASSOCIATES, ET AL.; from Dallas County; 5th district
(05-06-00003-CV, 238 SW3d 800, 08-31-07)
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Justice O'Neill delivered the opinion of the Court. [pdf]
View E-Briefs in THE STATE OF TEXAS v. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SIGN ASSOCIATES (Tex. 2009)
State of Texas v. Bristol Hotel Asset Co., No. 07-0896 (Tex. May 15, 2009)(per curiam) (condemnation takings
claim, uncompensable losses, lost revenue testimony should have been excluded)
THE STATE OF TEXAS v. BRISTOL HOTEL ASSET CO.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-06-00150-CV, ___
SW3d ___, 07-18-07)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion.
09-0556
USDR, INC. AND JOHN ROBINSON v. CABOT CAPITAL CORPORATION AND CABOT ESTATES, LLC; from
Tarrant County; 8th district (08-07-00202-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-30-09, pet. denied Sep. 2009)
(witness testimony should have been excluded)